<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exercise 5-5: Rollover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.learningprocessing.com/exercises/chapter-5/exercise-5-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.learningprocessing.com</link>
	<description>A Beginner's Guide to Programming Images, Animation, and Interaction by Daniel Shiffman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chalubert Clement</title>
		<link>http://www.learningprocessing.com/exercises/chapter-5/exercise-5-5/comment-page-1/#comment-20721</link>
		<dc:creator>Chalubert Clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learningprocessing.com/?page_id=1464#comment-20721</guid>
		<description>WHat would be great here is presenting a solution when you have couple &quot;interactive&quot; objects on few different &quot;layers&quot; (which don&#039;t exist in Processing vanilla), to differentiate them. So the bounds checking wouldn&#039;t be enough to get a relevant rollover. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHat would be great here is presenting a solution when you have couple &#8220;interactive&#8221; objects on few different &#8220;layers&#8221; (which don&#8217;t exist in Processing vanilla), to differentiate them. So the bounds checking wouldn&#8217;t be enough to get a relevant rollover. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

